Relevance of the Ministry of Religious Affairs' Religious Education Curriculum: Analysis of Knowledge, Skills, and Policy Implementation Gaps

Authors

  • Dwi Agustiningsih Bureau of Planning and Budgeting, Ministry of Religious of the Republic of Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61860/amuya.v1i2.17

Abstract

This policy paper aims to analyze the gap between the religious education curriculum implemented by the Ministry of Religious Affairs and the knowledge and skills needs of students in the digital era. The background of this problem is the lack of relevance of the curriculum to current developments that require students to have digital literacy, critical thinking skills, and multicultural understanding. The research method used is a qualitative approach with case studies in several madrasahs and public schools in Indonesia, involving in-depth interviews with teachers, students, and policymakers, as well as analysis of curriculum documents. The results of the study indicate a significant gap, where teaching materials tend to focus on theoretical aspects and memorization, while practical skills and the implementation of religious values ​​in daily life are still minimal. Further discussion highlights that the implementation of curriculum policies is often hampered by a lack of teacher training, inadequate supporting facilities, and resistance to change. The conclusion of this study is that the current religious education curriculum requires substantial reform to be more relevant and adaptive to contemporary challenges. Recommendations include developing a competency-based curriculum, strengthening teacher training programs, integrating technology into learning, and developing more participatory policies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Banks, J. A. (2004). Multicultural education: Historical development, dimensions, and practice. In J. A. Banks & C. A. M. Banks (Eds.), Handbook of research on multicultural education (pp. 3–29). Jossey-Bass.

Bennett, C. I. (2011). Comprehensive multicultural education: Theory and practice. Pearson.

Bruner, J. S. (1996). The culture of education. Harvard University Press.

Cahyono, B., & Wulandari, R. (2018). Kesenjangan soft skills mahasiswa dengan kebutuhan dunia kerja. Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi, 8(2), 127-136.

Collins, R. (1994). Four sociological traditions. Oxford University Press.

Dahrendorf, R. (1959). Class and class conflict in industrial society. Stanford University Press.

DiMaggio, P., Hargittai, E., Neuman, W. R., & Robinson, J. P. (2001). Social implications of the Internet: The digital divide. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 307–336.

Eichinger, J., & Downing, J. (2011). Functional curriculum for students with moderate and severe disabilities. Brookes Publishing.

Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Seabury Press.

Gay, G. (2010). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice. Teachers College Press.

Giroux, H. A. (2011). On critical pedagogy. Bloomsbury Publishing.

Glatthorn, A. A. (1998). The functional curriculum: A practical guide to curriculum planning. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

Hidayat, R. (2018). Problematika pendidikan multikultural di Indonesia. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 3(2), 175-190.

hooks, b. (1994). Teaching to transgress: Education as the practice of freedom. Routledge.

Marx, K. (1867/1977). Capital: A critique of political economy. Vintage.

Maslow, A. H. (1968). Toward a psychology of being. Van Nostrand Reinhold.

McKinsey & Company. (2020). The future of work: The impact of automation on jobs. McKinsey Global Institute.

Norris, P. (2001). Digital divide: Civic engagement, information poverty, and the Internet worldwide. Cambridge University Press.

Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2018). The future of education and skills: Education 2030. OECD Publishing.

Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2017). Skills for a changing world. OECD Publishing.

Partnership for 21st Century Learning (P21). (2019). P21 framework for 21st century learning. P21.

Rogers, C. R. (1969). Freedom to learn: A view of what education might become. Charles E. Merrill.

Rogers, C. R., & Freiberg, H. J. (1994). Freedom to learn (3rd ed.). Merrill/Macmillan.

Rogoff, B. (2003). The cultural nature of human development. Oxford University Press.

Rosyada, D. (2017). Pendidikan multikultural sebagai solusi atas konflik sosial. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 23(1), 1-14.

Suharsono. (2017). Pendidikan multikultural: Konsep dan aplikasi. Pustaka Pelajar.

UNESCO. (2017). Global education monitoring report: Accountability in education. UNESCO Publishing.

United Nations. (1995). Declaration of principles on tolerance. UNESCO.

van Dijk, J. A. G. M. (2020). The digital divide: The essential guide. Polity Press.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

Wehmeyer, M. L., & Agran, M. (2018). Teaching self-determination to students with disabilities. Guilford Press.

World Bank. (2019). World development report 2019: The changing nature of work. World Bank Publications.

Laporan dan Survei

Pusat Pengkajian Islam dan Masyarakat (PPIM) UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta. (2018). Pendidikan Agama untuk Era Digital. Jakarta: PPIM UIN Jakarta.

Wahid Foundation. (2017). Laporan Penelitian Sikap Guru dan Dosen Pendidikan Agama Islam Terhadap Isu Toleransi dan Radikalisme. Jakarta: Wahid Foundation.

Kementerian Agama Republik Indonesia. (2019). Laporan Evaluasi Kurikulum Madrasah. Jakarta: Puslitbang Pendidikan Agama dan Keagamaan, Kemenag RI.

Kementerian Agama Republik Indonesia. (2020). Laporan Profil Guru PAI. Jakarta: Puslitbang Pendidikan Agama dan Keagamaan, Kemenag RI.

Ikatan Penerbit Indonesia (IKAPI). (2021). Survei Tren Penulisan Buku Ajar Pendidikan di Indonesia. Jakarta: IKAPI.

Lembaga Kajian Islam dan Pendidikan (LKIP). (2020). Analisis Konten Buku Ajar Pendidikan Agama Islam. Jakarta: LKIP.

Komisi Perlindungan Anak Indonesia (KPAI). (2021). Laporan Tahunan Perlindungan Anak dalam Ranah Digital. Jakarta: KPAI.

Puslitbang Pendidikan Agama dan Keagamaan, Kemenag RI. (2021). Laporan Kesenjangan Implementasi Kurikulum di Daerah. Jakarta: Puslitbang Pendidikan Agama dan Keagamaan, Kemenag RI.

Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional (Bappenas). Laporan Tahunan Alokasi Anggaran Pendidikan. (Data tahunan, bervariasi).

Downloads

Published

13-12-2025

How to Cite

Agustiningsih, D. (2025). Relevance of the Ministry of Religious Affairs’ Religious Education Curriculum: Analysis of Knowledge, Skills, and Policy Implementation Gaps. AMUYA: INDONESIAN JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT REVIEWS, 1(2), 167–192. https://doi.org/10.61860/amuya.v1i2.17