Zakat Fund Allocation Conflict: Obstacles to Financing Single Tuition Fees for Mustahik Students
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61860/amuya.v2i1.68Abstract
The implementation of zakat fund scholarships for the Single Tuition Fee (UKT) of underprivileged students at IAIN Langsa faces serious challenges due to a structural conflict between the Shariah distribution mandate to the eight asnaf (recipients) and the real constraints of collected funds. Theoretically, this limitation is a manifestation of the Zakat Fiscal Gap at the regional level, where the potential for zakat collection significantly exceeds its realization, severely restricting the resources available for education programs (fii sabilillah) (Badruddin 2019). This fiqh allocation conflict is compounded by internal governance policies, specifically selection criteria based on the Grade Point Average (IPK), which tends to prioritize academic accountability over the distributive justice principle to the most needy mustahik, and the weak post-disbursement monitoring and evaluation (monev) mechanism that hinders the measurement of the program's real impact (Nurrahmat et al. 2023). This policy study utilizes a qualitative approach involving document analysis, supported by the theoretical frameworks of Fiqh Asnaf, Zakat Fiscal Gap Theory, and Sustainable Social Financing Theory. In-depth analysis using root-cause analysis identified the primary root problem as fund inadequacy due to the fiscal gap and unresolved fiqh allocation conflict. There is an urgent need to balance the Shariah goal of poverty alleviation with the managerial needs of educational institutions. After scoring various policy alternatives, the best option is the Regulation on the Progressive UKT Cost-Sharing Scheme based on Poverty Level. This scheme is deemed most optimal as it ensures the largest portion of the zakat subsidy is directed towards students in the extreme poverty category, effectively addressing the issues of equity and fund sufficiency. Therefore, the recommended policy solution is a Joint Decree on Prioritizing Zakat Fii Sabilillah Allocation for Human Resource Investment and integrating the progressive cost-sharing scheme to create a sustainable, equitable, and impact-oriented educational financing model.
Downloads
References
A.W. Munawwir. 1997. “E-Book Kamus Al-Munawwir Arab-Indonesia Terlengkap.” 237.
Alshodiq, Mukhtar. 2020. Himpunan Peraturan Sistem Perbukuan dan Hak Cipta di Indonesia: Dilengkapi Peraturan Tentang Pemberian ISBN dan Akreditasi Penerbitan Ilmiah. Jakarta: Branda Media Nusantara.
Amalia, R., & Mubarok, A. (2021). Prioritas penyaluran dana zakat pada sektor pendidikan: Dilema antara keunggulan akademik dan kebutuhan ekonomi. Jurnal Ekonomi Islam, 9(1), 22–38.
Badruddin, B. (2019). Analisis kesenjangan fiskal zakat di Indonesia. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Keuangan Islam, 5(1), 1–18.
Beik, I. S., & Arsyianti, L. D. (2016). Ekonomi Pembangunan Islam: Teori, Konsep, dan Aplikasi. Rajawali Pers.
Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40.
Butt, Simon and Tim Lindsey. 2018. Indonesian Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dunn, W. N. (2018). Public policy analysis: An integrated approach (6th ed.). Routledge.
Fikriyana, F. (2022). Strategi pengembangan program beasiswa berbasis zakat untuk peningkatan akses pendidikan tinggi. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis Islam, 7(2), 110–125.
Gunakaya, A. Widiada. 2015. Pengantar Hukum Indonesia. Bandung: STHB Press.
Hafidhuddin, D. (2021). Manajemen Zakat dalam Perspektif Islam. Gema Insani.
Hamdi. 2023. “Kebijakan Pengelolaan Program Bantuan Operasional Sekolah (BOS) dalam Peningkatan Kualitas Pendidikan Madrasah di Kabupaten Kerinci.” Jurnal Ilmiah Gema Perencana 2(2):309–32. doi: https://doi.org/10.61860/jigp.v2i2.75.
Harahap, M. Yahya. 2017. Hukum Acara Perdata: Tentang Gugatan, Persidangan, Penyitaan, Pembuktian dan Putusan Pengadilan, Edited by Tarmizi. Ed. Revisi. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Heny, Hendrayati, dan Budhi Pamungkas. 2016. “Implementasi Model Hybrid Learning pada Proses Pembelajaran Mata Kuliah Statistika II di Prodi Manajemen FPEB UPI.” Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan LPPM UPI 3(1):182.
Imaniyati, Neni Sri, Asep Rozali, dan Neneng Nurhasanah. 2017. Menimbang Perbankan Syariah (Konsep, Regulasi dan Praktik di Indonesia). Bandung: Pusat Penerbitan Univesitas (P2U) LPPM Universitas Islam Bandung.
Indonesia. Undang-Undang Nomor 25 Tahun 2007 tentang Penanaman Modal, Pub. L. No. 67 Tahun 2007.
Kaufman, R. A., & Watkins, R. (2022). Strategic planning: The basics (3rd ed.). Routledge.
Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia. 2020. Putusan Nomor 863 K/PDT/2020. Jakarta: Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia
Mutamimah, M., et al. (2023). Prioritas alokasi dana zakat untuk program pendidikan. Jurnal Ekonomi Syariah, 10(1), 45–60.
Nott, Jemma. 2020. “China’s Belt and Road (BRI): Investment and Lending Practices in Developing Countries. Is There a “Debt Trap”?.” https://www.globalresearch.ca/chinas-belt-and-road-bri-investment-and-lending-practices-in-developing-countries-is-there-a-debt-trap/5722107.
Nurrahmat, A., et al. (2023). Efektivitas program beasiswa zakat: Tinjauan dari aspek monitoring dan evaluasi. Jurnal Keuangan dan Perbankan Syariah, 11(2), 78–93.
Prasetyo, A. D., & Jannah, L. M. (2024). Analisis faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi efisiensi biaya operasional lembaga amil zakat. Jurnal Manajemen Keuangan Syariah, 5(1), 55–70.
Priyatno, Dwidja dan Kristian. 2019. Delik Agama (Dalam KUHP dan Rancangan KUHP Indonesia dan Telaah Perbandingan Hukum dengan KUHP Inggris, Belanda, Malaysia, Thailand, Singapura, Jerman, Perancis, Kanada, Latvia, dan Finlandia). Bandung: Pustaka Reka Cipta.
Saragih, Bonarsius. 2015. "Kebijakan Pengawasan terhadap Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia (Polri) sebagai Penegak Hukum yang Profesional dalam Perspektif Sistem Peradilan Pidana". Disertasi Program Doktor Ilmu Hukum. Bandung: Universitas Katolik Parahyangan.
Setiawan, A. (2024). Efektivitas dan efisiensi manajemen zakat: Tinjauan strategi prioritas program di LAZ. Jurnal Filantropi Islam, 12(1), 1–15.
Soenandar, Taryana, Fathurrahman Djamil, Mariam Darus Badrulzaman, Sutan Remy Sjahdeini, dan Heru Soepraptomo. 2016. Kompilasi Hukum Perikatan. Cet. 2. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.
Stamper, Kory. 2017. “From ‘F-Bomb’ to ‘Photobomb,’ How the Dictionary Keeps Up with English.” Interview by Terry Gross, 19 April 2017.
Sugiarto, Irwan. 2007. "The Significance of Good Corporate Governance Principles in the Company Law of 2007." Mimbar: Sosial dan Pembangunan 33, No. 1 (2017): 37–45. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.29313/mimbar.v33i1.2067.
Sunaryo, Agus. 2025. Modul Perencanaan Sosial: Diklat Penjenjangan Perencana Tingkat Madya, Muda, Pertama Kementerian Agama. Jakarta: Branda Media Nusantara.
Supriatna, E. (2018). Akuntabilitas dan transparansi lembaga amil zakat sebagai upaya meningkatkan kepercayaan publik. Jurnal Akuntansi Syariah, 6(2), 150–165.
Syafi'i, A., & Hasanah, N. (2022). Peran literasi keuangan syariah dalam meningkatkan kesadaran zakat maal. Jurnal Ilmu Ekonomi Islam, 9(2), 88–105.
Taufik, Giri Ahmad. 2017. ‘Freeport dan Posisi Hukum RI’. Kompas, 20 March 2017.
Tho'in, M. (2017). Analisis biaya kuliah dan strategi pembiayaan pendidikan di perguruan tinggi negeri. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Ekonomi, 15(2), 112–128.
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia. (2011). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 23 Tahun 2011 tentang Pengelolaan Zakat. Sekretariat Negara.
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia. 2003. Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 20 Tahun 2003 tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional.
Widyantini, Rini, et.al. 2017. Bunga Rampai Pertanggungjawaban Hukum Diskresi Pasca Berlakunya Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2014 tentang Administrasi Pemerintahan. Edited by Zainal Muttaqin. Bandung: Departemen Hukum Administrasi Negara Fakultas Hukum Universitas Padjadjaran.
Winata, Agung Sujati. 2018. "Perlindungan Investor Asing dalam Kegiatan Penanaman Modal Asing dan Implikasinya Terhadap Negara." Ajudikasi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 2, No. 2, 2018.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Hadi Syahputra

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.



