Beyond Separation and Establishment: State–Religion Relations and Inclusive Governance in Contemporary Democracies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61860/amuya.v2i2.126Keywords:
Inclusive Governance, Public Administration, Religious Policy, State–Religion RelationsAbstract
State–religion relations in contemporary democracies are increasingly shaped by religious diversity, institutional pluralism, and the growing involvement of public authorities in regulating recognition, accommodation, participation, and access to public resources. However, existing studies often examine constitutional arrangements, administrative implementation, and democratic outcomes separately, leaving limited integration across these dimensions. This study examines how institutional arrangements and religious-policy practices shape substantive inclusion, the conditions under which recognition, accommodation, cooperation, and regulation support or constrain inclusive governance, and the role of participation and accountability in representing religious and nonreligious constituencies. Using a qualitative comparative conceptual analysis, the study synthesizes peer-reviewed scholarship and comparative secondary evidence through theory-guided thematic comparison and comparative conceptual synthesis. The analysis focuses on institutional arrangements, governance processes, and democratic outcomes. The findings show that formal guarantees of equality and religious freedom provide an important institutional foundation but do not ensure substantive inclusion. Administrative interpretation, organizational routines, local political conditions, and participatory arrangements influence how formal rules are implemented. Recognition and accommodation may expand institutional access while also raising questions concerning individual autonomy, representation, and equal protection. Democratic outcomes vary across equality, non-discrimination, political voice, access to resources, institutional confidence, and social trust. The study concludes that inclusive state–religion governance depends on the alignment of institutional protection, consistent implementation, representative participation, rights safeguards, and accountable public administration rather than on any single model of state–religion relations.
Downloads
References
Abbas, T., & Khattab, N. (2026). Belief, belonging, and borders: Mapping faith, identity, and integration across European cities. Quality & Quantity, 60, 3847–3871. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-025-02386-2
Apelt, M., Koch, A., Michalowski, I., Molzberger, K., Schenk, L., & Schmidt, M. O. (2023). How organisations regulate Muslim body practices: A comparison of schools, hospitals, and swimming pools. Comparative Migration Studies, 11, Article 32. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40878-023-00355-y
Astor, A., Griera, M., & Cornejo, M. (2019). Religious governance in the Spanish city: Hands-on versus hands-off approaches to accommodating religious diversity in Barcelona and Madrid. Religion, State & Society, 47(4–5), 390–404. https://doi.org/10.1080/09637494.2019.1668213
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? Qualitative Research in Psychology, 18(3), 328–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238
Elsayed, S. (2023). Exiled at home: British Muslims’ experiences of integration. Frontiers in Sociology, 8, Article 1172057. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2023.1172057
Ettensperger, F., & Schleutker, E. (2022). Identification of cross-country similarities and differences in regulation of religion between 2000 and 2014 with help of cluster analysis. Politics and Religion, 15(3), 526–558. https://doi.org/10.1017/S175504832100033X
Fahmi, G., & Lahlou, M. (2022). Negotiating religion-state relations in the MENA region: Actors’ dynamics, modes, and norms. Religion, State & Society, 50(4), 436–451. https://doi.org/10.1080/09637494.2022.2135350
Finke, R., & Mataic, D. R. (2021). Reconciling state promises and practices: Constitutional promises and discrimination against religious minorities. Social Compass, 68(3), 301–320. https://doi.org/10.1177/00377686211012350
Fox, J., & Breslawski, J. (2023). State support for religion and government legitimacy in Christian-majority countries. American Political Science Review, 117(4), 1395–1409. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055422001320
Fox, J., Eisenstein, M., & Breslawski, J. (2024). State support for religion and social trust. Political Studies, 72(1), 322–342. https://doi.org/10.1177/00323217221102826
Golan-Nadir, N. (2024). Religion and public administration at the micro level: The lens of street-level bureaucracy theory in democracies. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 83(4), 736–748. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8500.12626
Gülalp, H. (2023). Debating secularism: A liberal cosmopolitan perspective. Frontiers in Sociology, 8, Article 1113208. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2023.1113208
Güveli, A., & Platt, L. (2023). Religiosity of migrants and natives in Western Europe 2002–2018: Convergence and divergence. European Journal of Population, 39, Article 9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-023-09660-9
Jaakkola, E. (2020). Designing conceptual articles: Four approaches. AMS Review, 10, 18–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13162-020-00161-0
Jacinto, E., Figueiredo Dalla Costa Ames, M. C., Serafim, M. C., & Zappellini, M. B. (2023). Religion-spirituality influences in the governance of faith-based organizations during the Covid pandemic. Public Organization Review, 23(2), 531–550. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-023-00704-6
Johnsen, E. T., & Johansen, K. H. (2021). Negotiating Christian cultural heritage: Christmas in schools and public service media. Temenos: Nordic Journal for the Study of Religion, 57(2), 231–257. https://doi.org/10.33356/temenos.102585
Kühle, L. (2022). A ‘Nordic religious freedom paradox’? Freedom of religion and belief as constructed by two global datasets. Temenos: Nordic Journal for the Study of Religion, 58(2), 239–265. https://doi.org/10.33356/temenos.113467
Mekawi, Y. (2026). Facing Janus: Local politics, Muslim leadership, and regulatory outcomes in Belgium. Politics and Religion, 19(1), 91–120. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755048326100248
Modood, T., & Sealy, T. (2022). Developing a framework for a global comparative analysis of the governance of religious diversity. Religion, State & Society, 50(4), 362–377. https://doi.org/10.1080/09637494.2022.2117526
Modood, T., & Sealy, T. (2026). Political secularisms and (ethno-)religious minorities. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 49(3), 633–640. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2025.2488364
Nelson, M. J., & Shah, D. A. H. (2018). Operationalizing and regulating religious freedom: Apostasy and administrative “reasonableness”. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 16(4), 1293–1321. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/moy100
Ongaro, E., & Tantardini, M. (2024). Religion, spirituality, faith and public administration: A literature review and outlook. Public Policy and Administration, 39(4), 531–555. https://doi.org/10.1177/09520767221146866
Ozzano, L. (2026). Interreligious dialogue and local governance in Europe: A political science perspective. Religions, 17(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/rel17020234
Perez, N. (2023). The rise of public–private religious partnerships: Arguing church autonomy in the era of public funding of religion. Oxford Journal of Law and Religion, 12(1), 17–33. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojlr/rwad022
Pfaff, S., Crabtree, C., Kern, H. L., & Holbein, J. B. (2021). Do street-level bureaucrats discriminate based on religion? A large-scale correspondence experiment among American public school principals. Public Administration Review, 81(2), 244–259. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13235
Pirosa, R. (2021). The majoritarian epistemology on religious symbols: A religiously-based stereotyping technique to “package others’ religious rights”. The Age of Human Rights Journal, 16, 278–291. https://doi.org/10.17561/tahrj.v16.6085
Ryu, Y. (2025). Local government administration and biopolitics: Surrounding conflicts over the construction of mosque in South Korea. Cities, 159, Article 105790. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2025.105790
Sealy, T., Ibrahim, Z., Zulian, P. B., & Rasid, I. M. (2022). South and Southeast Asia: Deep diversity under strain. Religion, State & Society, 50(4), 452–468. https://doi.org/10.1080/09637494.2022.2126258
Sealy, T., & Modood, T. (2022). Diversities and dynamics in the governance of religion: Inter-regional comparative themes. Religion, State & Society, 50(4), 469–485. https://doi.org/10.1080/09637494.2022.2132079
Taira, T., & Beaman, L. (2022). Majoritarian religion, cultural justification and nonreligion: Finland in the international context. Temenos: Nordic Journal for the Study of Religion, 58(2), 193–216. https://doi.org/10.33356/temenos.113798
Tirosh, Y. (2024). Consent, multiculturalism, and exit: A contemporary critique of religious accommodation and the right to sex equality. Political Theology, 25(6), 651–675. https://doi.org/10.1080/1462317X.2024.2310409
Vékony, D., Iliyasov, M., & Račius, E. (2022). Dynamics in state-religion relations in postcommunist Central Eastern Europe and Russia. Religion, State & Society, 50(4), 415–435. https://doi.org/10.1080/09637494.2022.2127591
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Sobi Ghozani, Ani Sumarni, Gianno Robert Poulos
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
