Strengthening Performance-Based Budgeting Through Standardization of Tridharma Indicators at UIN Alauddin Makassar
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61860/amuya.v2i1.62Keywords:
governance, Key Performance Indicators, monitoring and evaluation, performance-based budgeting, TridharmaAbstract
This policy paper analyzes the output-based planning and budgeting system at UIN Alauddin Makassar, which continues to face serious obstacles in measuring and verifying the contribution of Tridharma (the three pillars of higher education) activities toward the university's Key Performance Indicators (KPIs). This study identifies the primary weakness in the absence of specific, measurable, and standardized performance indicators, resulting in evaluations that emphasize administrative activities rather than substantive outcomes. Further analysis reveals that weak monitoring and evaluation mechanisms, limited human resource capacity, and fragmented data systems exacerbate the ineffectiveness of performance-based budgeting. The USG (Urgency, Seriousness, Growth) method was applied to determine priority issues, indicating that the weakness of output–outcome measurement is the most critical problem. These findings demonstrate that performance measurement is not merely a technical issue but a governance problem affecting accountability, expenditure effectiveness, and evidence-based decision-making. The study recommends establishing standardized cross-unit performance indicators, integrating monitoring and evaluation systems with performance data, and strengthening analytical capacity as strategic measures to ensure that planning and budgeting systems genuinely support measurable and sustainable institutional goals.
Downloads
References
Armstrong, M. (2020). Handbook of performance management: An evidence-based guide to delivering results (6th ed.). Kogan Page.
Bappenas. (2023). Panduan integrasi perencanaan dan penganggaran berbasis kinerja. Kementerian Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional/Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional.
Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27-40.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
Budiman, N. (2020). Sinkronisasi perencanaan strategis dan penganggaran: Studi kasus pada perguruan tinggi negeri. Jurnal Administrasi Negara, 25(1), 45-60.
Creswell, J. W. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Dunn, W. N. (2018). Public policy analysis (6th ed.). Pearson Education.
Dwiyanto, A. (2018). Reformasi birokrasi dan good governance. Gadjah Mada University Press.
Kallio, H., Pietilä, A. M., Johnson, M., & Halonen, P. (2016). Systematic methodological review: Developing a framework for a semi-structured interview guide. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 72(11), 2954-2965.
Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1992). The balanced scorecard—measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 70(1), 71-79.
Kementerian Keuangan Republik Indonesia. (2022). Pedoman penyusunan anggaran berbasis kinerja. Direktorat Jenderal Anggaran.
Mahsun, M. (2019). Pengukuran kinerja sektor publik. BPFE.
Prasetyo, A., & Setiawan, B. (2021). Pembangunan kapasitas sumber daya manusia dan literasi data dalam mendukung kebijakan berbasis bukti di perguruan tinggi. Jurnal Kebijakan Publik, 12(3), 150-165.
Rahayu, S. (2020). Integrasi sistem informasi kinerja dan anggaran sebagai implementasi good governance di perguruan tinggi. Jurnal Ilmu Komputer dan Informasi, 13(2), 87-98.
Rahman, H. (2020). Peran kepemimpinan visioner dalam menumbuhkan budaya manajerial berbasis data di perguruan tinggi. Jurnal Kepemimpinan Pendidikan, 7(1), 1-15.
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia. (2003). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 17 Tahun 2003 tentang Keuangan Negara.
World Bank. (2017). Higher education governance and management: An international perspective. The World Bank.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Muhammad Hidayat
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
