Balancing Publication Incentives and Downstream Research at State Islamic University of North Sumatra Medan for Regional Independence
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61860/amuya.v2i1.50Keywords:
Policy analysis; Perverse ncentives; Research gap; Rigor relevance; Research synergyAbstract
This Policy Paper provides an overview of the main policy studied, namely the low synergy of research programs at UIN Sumatera Utara Medan based on community and industry needs, which directly hampers the effectiveness and impact of research outputs. This problem is rooted in three policy factors: 1) research orientation gap; 2) lecturer evaluation system that prioritizes journal publication; and 3) national regulatory pressure and institutional accreditation targets. This failure of synergy is caused by perverse policy incentives, where lecturers rationally choose quickly measurable outputs (publications) over impactful outputs (downstream), a phenomenon reinforced by metrics fixation and relevance-rigour trade-off. This study uses a descriptive qualitative method with a policy analysis approach. Data were collected through a study of statutory regulatory documents (UU, PMA) and technical guidelines at UIN Sumatera Utara Medan, reinforced by theoretical and conceptual literature studies (triple helix model, principal-agent theory, and user-centric research). The evaluation of alternative policies was conducted comparatively using William N. Dunn scoring analysis based on the criteria of effectiveness, efficiency, adequacy, equity, and responsiveness. Dunn's analysis identified that mandatory stakeholder engagement in research proposals is a highly effective and responsive alternative. Therefore, it is recommended that the Rector of UIN Sumatera Utara Medan issue a Rector's Decree requiring evidence of stakeholder engagement (community or industry) in every internally funded research proposal. This recommendation aims to address the root cause of distorted incentives by forcing a shift in research behavior from a publish-only focus to demand-driven and impact-oriented research.
Downloads
References
Arif, T. (2019). Strategi Peningkatan Hilirisasi Hasil Riset Perguruan Tinggi ke Dunia Usaha dan Industri. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan dan Kebijakan, 1(1), 1–15.
Dill, D. D. (2020). The New Public Management and the Policy-making Role of the Academic Profession: Challenges for the University. Springer.
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160.
Dunn, W. N. (2018). Public policy analysis: An integrated approach (6th ed.). Routledge.
Eko. (2025). Perguruan Tinggi Perlu Riset Multidisipliner agar Lebih Relevan dan Berdampak. UMY.
Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: From National Systems and 'Mode 2' to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109–123.
Handoko, R. T. (2021). Peran Lembaga Penghubung Perguruan Tinggi-Industri dalam Peningkatan Inovasi Nasional. Jurnal Sains dan Teknologi Indonesia.
Hendarman, H., & Supardi, Y. (2019). Strategi Peningkatan Kinerja Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat Perguruan Tinggi. Jurnal Inovasi dan Kebijakan Publik, 2(1), 1–18.
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360.
Kerr, S. (1995). On the folly of rewarding A, while hoping for B. Academy of Management Executive, 9(1), 7-17.
Lundvall, B. A., & Johnson, B. (1994). The learning economy. Journal of Industry Studies, 1(2), 23–42.
Muller, J. A. (2018). The tyranny of metrics. Princeton University Press.
Mulyani, S. (2021). Kebijakan Riset dan Kinerja Dosen di Era Industri 4.0. Jurnal Pendidikan Tinggi Islam.
Nasution, R. (2020). Problematika Hilirisasi Hasil Penelitian Perguruan Tinggi ke Industri di Indonesia. Jurnal Pendidikan Tinggi Islam.
OECD. (2019). The future of education and skills: Education 2030. OECD Publishing.
Patton, C. V., & Sawicki, D. S. (1993). Basic methods of policy analysis and planning (2nd ed.). Prentice-Hall.
Prasetyo, Y. E. (2019). Kolaborasi Perguruan Tinggi, Industri, dan Pemerintah dalam Konteks Pembangunan Daerah. Jurnal Kebijakan Publik, 10(2), 121–135.
Sari, D. S., & Wibowo, A. (2020). Peningkatan Kinerja Riset Perguruan Tinggi Melalui Perencanaan Strategis yang Berbasis Kebutuhan Stakeholder. Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan, 11(1), 77–90.
Setiawan, D. (2021). Peran Technology Transfer Office (TTO) dalam Menjembatani Hasil Riset dan Kebutuhan Industri. Jurnal Teknologi Informasi dan Sains*, 12(2), 88–101.
Sinaga, P., & Arifin, M. N. (2022). Peran Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat (LPPM) dalam Mendukung Pembangunan Daerah. Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Indonesia, 3(2), 101–110.
Siregar, A. M. (2022). Transformasi Perguruan Tinggi Keagamaan Islam Menuju Research University: Tantangan dan Strategi. Jurnal Studi Islam dan Pendidikan, 13(1), 45–60.
Starkey, K., & Madan, P. (2001). Bridging the relevance–rigour gap: The contribution of contextualized research. Journal of Management Studies, 38(3), 527-550.
Von Hippel, E. (1986). Lead users: A source of novel product concepts. Management Science, 32(7), 791–805.
Wardani, A. P., & Susanto, R. (2020). Strategi Kolaborasi Antara Perguruan Tinggi, Industri dan Pemerintah: Tinjauan Konseptual Dalam Upaya Meningkatkan Inovasi. Jurnal Knema, 3(2), 7–15.
Wijaya, T. (2020). Membangun Budaya Technopreneurship di Lingkungan Perguruan Tinggi. Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi*, 10(3), 250–265.
Wright, M. (2010). Kolaborasi Universitas-Industri: Tinjauan Konseptual Mekanisme Transfer Pengetahuan dari Universitas ke Industri. Neliti
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Darwis
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
