Public Value and Social Impact in Faith-Based Organizations: Toward Evidence-Based Religious Policy

Authors

  • Hasyim Asy’ari KH. Achmad Muzakki Syah Islamic University, Jember – East Java, Indonesia
  • Eko Prasetyo Regional Office of the Ministry of Religious Affairs, North Sulawesi Province, Indonesia
  • Nuniek Amin Abdullah Directorate General of Islamic Education, Ministry of Religious Affairs, Indonesia
  • Moh. Ahmed Ubaidallah University of Sharjah, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61860/amuya.v2i2.120

Keywords:

Evidence-Based Religious Policy, Faith-Based Organizations, Public Value, Social Impact

Abstract

Faith-based organizations (FBOs) contribute to welfare provision, public health, humanitarian assistance, and community development, yet their social contributions cannot be inferred from religious identity or service outputs alone. Existing research has examined FBO governance, service delivery, state–FBO relations, and sector-specific outcomes, but remains insufficiently integrated for explaining how social impact acquires broader public value and becomes relevant to evidence-based religious policy. This study examines how FBOs generate public value and social impact, identifies the contextual and institutional conditions shaping their emergence, distribution, and sustainability, and considers how such evidence can inform religious policy. A qualitative integrative review and conceptual synthesis, informed by realist reasoning, was employed. Peer-reviewed theoretical, empirical, and evaluative literature addressing FBOs, public value, social impact, governance, program evaluation, and evidence-based policymaking was selected according to its relevance to organizational practices, contextual conditions, outcomes, stakeholder experiences, equity, accountability, and legitimacy. The literature was analysed through combined deductive and inductive thematic analysis and iterative cross-source comparison. The synthesis indicates that faith-informed resources generate social impact through mechanisms including moral commitment, volunteer mobilization, relational accessibility, solidarity, and community trust, whose operation varies across institutional and socio-religious contexts. Social impact acquires public value when outcomes are accessible, equitably distributed, accountable, inclusive, and publicly legitimate. These findings provide an analytical basis for evidence-based religious policy that evaluates FBO involvement through demonstrated outcomes, contextual conditions, stakeholder experiences, distributional consequences, and governance arrangements rather than organizational identity alone.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Benjamin, L. M., Ebrahim, A., & Gugerty, M. K. (2023). Nonprofit organizations and the evaluation of social impact: A research program to advance theory and practice. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 52(1_suppl), 313S–352S. https://doi.org/10.1177/08997640221123590

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? Qualitative Research in Psychology, 18(3), 328–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238

Day, K. R., Bernhart, J. A., & Wilcox, S. (2024). Barriers and facilitators to 24-month maintenance of the Faith, Activity, and Nutrition Program in the U.S. Journal of Religion and Health, 63, 3134–3157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-024-02012-9

Feor, L., Clarke, A., & Dougherty, I. (2023). Social impact measurement: A systematic literature review and future research directions. World, 4(4), 816–837. https://doi.org/10.3390/world4040051

Handley, K. L. (2025). Accountability and social impact evaluation in a small NPO: Stakeholder ambiguity, networks and trust. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 38(9), 239–264. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-07-2023-6547

Hounmenou, C. (2023). Experiences of faith-based organizations as key stakeholders in policy responses to human trafficking. Societies, 13(8), 193. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc13080193

Jacinto, E., Ames, M. C. F. D. C., Serafim, M. C., & Zappellini, M. B. (2023). Religion-spirituality influences in the governance of faith-based organizations during the Covid pandemic. Public Organization Review, 23, 531–550. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-023-00704-6

Johnson, A. P., Meier, K. J., & Geva, N. (2025). Faith-based nonprofits and the delivery of public services: An experimental study of sector-bias. Journal of Policy Studies, 40(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.52372/jps.e682

Lionardo, A., Nomaini, F., Bafadhal, O. M., Santoso, A. D., & Alfitri. (2024). What makes Indonesian government officials believe in and implement evidence-based policy: The mediating role of religion-science compatibility beliefs. Heliyon, 10(3), e24879. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24879

Lotta, G., Cortez, A. C., Magri, G., Sanches Costa, M. I., Barcellos Rosa, T., & Almeida, D. N. (2024). “Jesus speaks better”: Interactions between state and faith-based organizations in service implementation. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 53(2), 402–427. https://doi.org/10.1177/08997640231165525

Maes, S., Schrooten, M., Raeymaeckers, P., & Broeckaert, B. (2023). Faith based organizations: Types and typologies. A scoping review (2010–2021). Journal of Religion & Spirituality in Social Work: Social Thought, 42(2), 211–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/15426432.2023.2188511

Maes, S., Schrooten, M., Raeymaeckers, P., & Broeckaert, B. (2024). Faith-based organizations and poverty alleviation: A scoping review on definitions and terminology (2010–2021). Journal of Religion & Spirituality in Social Work: Social Thought, 43(1), 69–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/15426432.2023.2270930

Mettang, O., & Euchner, E.-M. (2023). Christian churches and social welfare in secular times: How goal congruence shapes religious involvement in morality-based social services. Politics and Religion, 16(2), 266–285. https://doi.org/10.1017/S175504832200030X

Nicol, J. U., Iwu-Jaja, C. J., Hendricks, L., Nyasulu, P., & Young, T. (2022). The impact of faith-based organizations on maternal and child health care outcomes in Africa: Taking stock of research evidence. Pan African Medical Journal, 43, 168. https://doi.org/10.11604/pamj.2022.43.168.32983

Nielsen, S. B., Lemire, S., & Tangsig, S. (2022). Unpacking context in realist evaluations: Findings from a comprehensive review. Evaluation, 28(1), 91–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/13563890211053032

Piatak, J. S., & Jensen, C. (2024). Public values and sector service delivery preferences: Public preferences on contracting from simple to complex human services. Public Administration Review, 84(5), 948–965. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13794

Prianto, A. L., Usman, S., Amri, A. R., Nurmandi, A., Qodir, Z., Jubba, H., & Ilik, G. (2023). Faith-based organizations’ humanitarian work from the disaster risk governance perspective: Lessons from Covid-19 pandemic in Indonesia. Mazahib, 22(1), 129–174. https://doi.org/10.21093/mj.v22i1.6317

Rachmawati, E., Umniyatun, Y., Rosyidi, M., & Nurmansyah, M. I. (2022). The roles of Islamic faith-based organizations on countermeasures against the COVID-19 pandemic in Indonesia. Heliyon, 8(2), e08928. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e08928

Roodbari, H., Nielsen, K., & Axtell, C. (2023). What works for whom in which circumstances? An integrated realist evaluation model for organisational interventions. Scandinavian Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 8(1), Article 4. https://doi.org/10.16993/sjwop.171

Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039

Song, M. Y., Blake-Hepburn, D., Karbasi, A., Fadel, S. A., Allin, S., Ataullahjan, A., & Di Ruggiero, E. (2024). Public health partnerships with faith-based organizations to support vaccination uptake among minoritized communities: A scoping review. PLOS Global Public Health, 4(6), e0002765. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0002765

Thabit, S., Sancino, A., & Mora, L. (2025). Strategic public value(s) governance: A systematic literature review and framework for analysis. Public Administration Review, 85(3), 885–906. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13877

Torraco, R. J. (2016). Writing integrative literature reviews: Using the past and present to explore the future. Human Resource Development Review, 15(4), 404–428. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484316671606

Wæraas, A., Sirris, S., & Hellevik, Ø. (2024). The added value of civil society organizations in the provision of welfare state services. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 35, 758–767. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-024-00639-6

Wilcox, S., Saunders, R. P., Kaczynski, A. T., Rudisill, A. C., Stucker, J., Kinnard, D., McKeever, B. W., Day, K. R., Parker-Brown, J., & Kim, Y. S. (2024). Constructs from the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research associated with church enrollment and intervention adoption in a national implementation study of a faith-based organizational change intervention. BMC Public Health, 24, 2401. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-19832-9

Downloads

Published

20-10-2026

How to Cite

Asy’ari, H., Prasetyo, E., Amin Abdullah, N., & Ubaidallah, M. A. (2026). Public Value and Social Impact in Faith-Based Organizations: Toward Evidence-Based Religious Policy. AMUYA: INDONESIAN JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT REVIEWS, 2(2), 591–616. https://doi.org/10.61860/amuya.v2i2.120

Similar Articles

<< < 5 6 7 8 9 10 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.